Whether to pull the buyout lever – a harder decision than ever?

Navigating the buyout decision: does the prospect of reform influence the merit of running on defined benefit pension schemes today?
2023 was a record year for defined benefit (DB) schemes passing assets and liabilities over to insurers. For those who have transacted one key benefit has been the mitigation of legislative risk, in other words that a government or regulator’s actions make running a DB scheme more painful. For a long time, travel has been in one direction: the bar for funding a DB scheme has been raised and the governance burden of running one has increased. Of course, there has been upside for members with stronger regulation having improved the security of accrued benefits, but this strengthening of regulation has been one of the key drivers in the closure of DB schemes and pivot to DC provision.
Beyond buying out and winding up a DB scheme, options for mitigating or managing legislative risk are limited. With trustees still working to equalise GMPs while also focusing on pensions dashboards, the new DB funding regime and additional climate (and potential nature) related disclosures this direction of travel might look set to continue for some time. But is it? Or could the balance here be about to shift from a risk mitigated to an opportunity missed?
Will the bar for funding a DB scheme be raised through the new funding regime?
The long-awaited new funding regime is due to apply for valuations with effective dates later this year. Currently it will raise the bar for some: faster funding and derisking. But generally schemes are starting from much stronger positions than when the new rules were conceived, and these stronger positions mean schemes are better resourced to manage both short and longer-term funding risks.
The Work and Pensions Select Committee (WPC) has been lukewarm about the new funding regime, noting that it was a result of The Pensions Regulator’s focus on protecting the Pension Protection Fund, an objective it has recommended could be disposed with1. Of course, select committees are not part of government and do not always succeed in influencing policy makers. The last parliament’s WPC was chaired Stephen Timms, now a minister in the DWP. Whether his colleague Emma Reynolds, the new pensions minister, shares these views remains to be seen. However, it is possible that the winds could be changing here.
Will employers and members be able to benefit from stronger funding positions?
So should that buyout lever be pulled?
- Policy Expert
Related solutions
-
DB schemesTrustees of Defined Benefit (DB) pension schemes have a legal requirement to ensure the appropriateness of AVC arrangements. Overlooking AVCs not only risks…
-
DB schemes
Liability-driven investing (LDI)
Liability-driven investing (LDI) at Mercer. We are solutions-orientated and offer LDI in two ways: Bespoke LDI and Multi-investor pooled LDI funds. The choice… -
DB schemes
The Benefits of Appointing a Professional Trustee
With the increasing complexity of pension regulations and the growing importance of good governance, many pension schemes are turning to a professional trustee.
Related insights
-
DB schemes
Covenant turns 21! What’s changed, the here and now, and what does the future hold?
Covenant is 21! Covenant is as important as ever, but the focus continues to evolve. Learn what’s changed and how it’s impacting clients and advisors alike, the… -
DB schemes
How AI agents can revolutionise the Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution pension markets
The next generation of effective, personalised AI applications can transform the way people plan for their future – a crucial factor in the pension landscape.… -
DB schemes
Navigating governance challenges: Insights and strategies for trustees
We surveyed trustees across the UK pensions landscape, including defined benefit (DB), defined contribution (DC) and hybrid schemes to understand how they are…