Executive Reward update
Improving the quality of 'comply or explain' reporting
In this briefing, we highlight key areas for Remuneration Committees to consider following the FRC’s March 2026 publication on Improving the quality of ‘comply or explain’ reporting - with a particular focus on executive remuneration disclosures and shareholder engagement. We believe that this is a welcome update, highlighting the purpose of the UK Corporate Governance Code as a framework for better board accountability – rather than a simple compliance or “box ticking” exercise. The Code’s flexibility allows companies to demonstrate governance tailored to their specific circumstances.
Remuneration policy and reporting implications
- Companies should disclose any departures from remuneration-related provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code.
- Where the relevant provision does not suit the company’s circumstances, it should be made clear why an alternative remuneration arrangement has been adopted.
- The rationale for the approach taken should be linked to strategy, performance, long-term value creation and risk.
- Reporting should demonstrate “actions and outcomes, not just policies and procedures”, particularly in relation to pay decisions, discretion and incentive outcomes.
- Additionally, disclosures should state whether any departures are time-limited or ongoing, and when (if at all) the company intends to return to compliance.
Shareholder engagement and AGM considerations
- Companies should consider how remuneration-related explanations will be received by shareholders and proxy advisers in advance of the AGM.
- They should also ensure transparency by naming any relevant Code provisions that have not been followed and signposting where explanations can be found.
- Shareholder engagement can be used to test whether remuneration explanations are “clear and meaningful”.
- Good practice would also include reporting shareholder feedback, where appropriate, within remuneration disclosures.
Embedding “comply or explain” into RemCo practice
- Be open to “explaining” where complying is not the optimal approach for the company.
- Ensure consistency between the remuneration policy, remuneration report and wider governance disclosures.
- Avoid ambiguity or boilerplate language in remuneration reporting. • Review RemCo decision-making to ensure explanations focus on outcomes and judgement, not just process.
- Keep RemCo terms of reference and reporting practices under review to reflect the flexible, principles-based nature of the Code.
About the author(s)
Rich Latham
- Senior Principal, UK Executive Reward
Related products for purchase
Related Solutions
Curated