State legislatures continue to focus on Rx 

senior-business-man-dicussion-client
June 29, 2023
Nearing halftime of 2023, state lawmakers have racked up points on prescription drug (Rx) reforms, with pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and plan sponsors largely playing defense. Several bills have scored, more have an open look as the shot clock winds down, and a court appeal in Denver is awaiting officials’ review. Here are first-half highlights and a preview of the third and fourth quarters:

Significant legislation already enacted

  • Arkansas
    The Share the Savings Act (effective on or about Aug. 1) requires fully insured plans and PBMs to apply all rebates to participant cost sharing at the point of sale (POS).
  • Colorado
    Two new laws apply to fully insured plans beginning in 2025. One law bans spread pricing (where a PBM charges more for a drug than its cost). A second law requires third-party assistance to apply to participant cost sharing, including deductibles, in many situations.
  • Florida
    The Prescription Drug Reform Act bans spread pricing and requires 100% of rebates to pass through to plan sponsors. This law (applicable to self-funded plans) also regulates network adequacy and increases transparency. The PBM provisions will take effect in 2024.
  • Texas
    Three laws scored from beyond the arc; another bill fouled out. First, a new law requires third-party Rx payment assistance to apply to an HMO’s or fully insured plan’s cost sharing, including deductibles, in certain situations. Second, a law prohibits a fully insured plan, as well as a self-funded professional employer organization (PEO) plan or multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA), from requiring physician-administered drugs be sourced from specific pharmacies (known as “white bagging”) where a participant has a chronic, complex, rare or life-threatening medical condition. The first two laws will take effect in 2024. Third, fully insured plans, as well as self-funded PEO plans and MEWAs, must provide Rx disclosures to participants and providers upon request, per a law effective in 2025. HB 2021 would have required PBMs of self-funded ERISA plans to comply with state law but failed to reach a floor vote after considerable opposition.
  • West Virginia
    Starting in 2024, insulin copay caps will drop from $100 to $35 for fully insured plans under a new law, which also implements a $100 copay cap on covered insulin devices, both for a 30-day supply.

Major legislation still pending

  • California
    Two bills have passed one house, months before the September recess: SB 873, a 90% Rx rebate pass-through at POS to participants, and SB 90, a $35/30-day supply insulin copay cap.
  • Illinois
    Two bills await Governor J.B. Pritzker’s signature: the Access to Affordable Insulin Act, reducing the insulin/30-day supply cap from $100 to $35 (effective July 1, 2025), and a PBM prohibition on retaliation against pharmacies for certain information disclosures (effective July 1, 2023). Both bills apply to fully insured plans.
  • New Jersey
    Two bills are worth watching. AB 1763/SB 788 would apply PBM rules to self-funded ERISA plans, effective the first day of the fourth month after enactment. AB 536 would require fully insured and self-funded plans to apply 100% of rebates at POS, effective the first day of the 18th month after enactment.
  • North Carolina
    A bill that passed the House in April would ban spread pricing, require a minimum dispensing fee payable to pharmacies and ban steerage to PBM-affiliated pharmacies, among other restrictions. PBM-managed self-funded plans would be in scope. This bill would apply to contracts issued, renewed or amended on or after Oct. 1, 2023.

10th Circuit decision expected in key ERISA preemption appeal

In May, the appellate court heard oral arguments in Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. Mulready, on an ERISA preemption challenge to an Oklahoma law regulating pharmacy networks. The US government’s amicus brief argued that certain provisions of the law were preempted by ERISA, but only as applied to self-funded plans directly engaging in the regulated conduct – not as applied to PBMs acting on behalf of self-funded plans. For additional background, see this US Health News article.

Details on many of these laws are available in this GRIST

About the author(s)
Rich Glass

Principal, Mercer's Law & Policy Group

Related products for purchase
Related Solutions
Related Insights
Related Case Studies
Curated