Mercer is becoming Marsh.

We are aware of an issue in the Microsoft environment impacting some of its services, including Outlook email. Marsh stands ready to help its clients with their risk, strategy, people and investment needs. Please contact your client representative directly via phone or text if you need anything. If you do not have their contact information or you have not received a reply from their email to any inquiries, please use our contact form.

Rethinking super tax concessions 

Superannuation tax concessions have been the subject of considerable public debate. In Mercer’s latest paper, Senior Actuarial Consultant Dr David Knox (AM) argues that we need to reframe the conversation, suggesting that the current approach doesn’t account for the longer term. 

Superannuation tax concessions have been the subject of much public discussion in recent years with many commentators arguing they are too generous, particularly for higher income earners. However, what is often ignored is that the published costs are based on Treasury figures released as part of the annual Tax Expenditure publication and do not represent the revenue gain that would occur if the concessions were removed or the longer-term Age Pension savings to the government. In brief, the published figures do not encourage a sensible and holistic public discussion about the appropriate level of superannuation tax concessions.

This paper takes a longer-term view and shows that for median and average income earners, the cost of the super tax concessions is actually less than the future saving in Age Pension costs arising from superannuation.

 

Rethinking Super tax concessions

Receive your copy of the ‘Rethinking super tax concessions’ to learn more about what this paper proposes.
 
About the author(s)
Dr David Knox BA PhD FIAA

Senior Actuarial Consultant

      Related Solutions
      Related Insights