Why quality manager selection within private markets matters 

In private markets, the performance gap between the best and worst performing managers may be significantly wider than in traditional public assets. As a wealth manager, have you considered how a manager’s ability to generate superior returns can be the key factor in the success of your clients' investments? Selecting the right managers is necessary for building a strong portfolio.

A disciplined selection process, long-term relationship-building, and localised research are essential for accessing high-quality investments. Are these elements part of your current approach to manager selection? By focusing on these factors, you can significantly increase the likelihood of achieving optimal performance for your clients.

When evaluating private market managers, wealth managers should focus on four key pillars: business management, alignment, strategy, and track record. Each pillar provides critical insights into the potential of a fund and its ability to generate consistent, high returns over time.

The semi-liquid fund market is still emerging, making it difficult for wealth managers to find long-term performance benchmarks due to the lack of established track records. As new funds continue to enter the market, assessing those with limited histories becomes a challenge, often requiring wealth managers to rely on the managers' experience with closed-ended funds that share similar teams and processes. Valuation is another hurdle, as semi-liquid funds must accurately assess private, non-traded investments, unlike publicly traded funds that can use market prices. Managers must also ensure they can meet liquidity needs, which varies by fund strategy, and gating mechanisms, while protective, can restrict access to capital during high redemption periods. Wealth managers should be cautious not to equate a strong brand with effective fund management, as past success does not guarantee future performance, making thorough, forward-looking due diligence crucial to avoid costly mistakes. To explore this topic further and gain deeper insights, check out our blog post: Choosing a semi-liquid private debt fund in a fast-growing market.

As circumstances evolve - whether due to succession changes, partner departures, or shifts in organisational dynamics - establishing strong communication channels between investors and managers is essential to mitigate potential risks. Even with a well-performing portfolio, it’s necessary to keep an active pipeline of high-quality managers. Despite frequent claims of top-quartile performance, investors must rigorously evaluate each manager, discerning which firms truly stand out. Complacency in private markets can be costly, so ensuring sustained, reliable performance demands continuous and thoughtful manager selection.

Wealth managers also require access to a comprehensive private market toolkit that encompasses strategic partnerships, SAA and portfolio construction, investment vehicles and platform access, portfolio diversification and liquidity management, as well as compliance and administration oversight.

To learn more about why top-quartile manager selection matters and how to strengthen your private market strategy, read our latest blog here.