Mercer is becoming Marsh.

Marsh CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2026 

October 2026

An analysis of 55 pension systems around the world

In collaboration with

Strengthening retirement income systems in an ageing world

Ageing populations, shifting workforce dynamics, and heightened geopolitical uncertainty are reshaping the retirement landscape. Now in its 18th edition, the Marsh CFA Institute Global Pension Index provides an established tool for benchmarking and comparing the world's retirement income systems, offering a structured framework to help decision-makers navigate the challenges ahead with greater clarity and confidence.

This year, the index benchmarks 55 pension systems worldwide with the addition of Dominican Republic, Kenya and Qatar – covering 66% of the world’s population – spotlighting both challenges and opportunities for policymakers.

Systems are assessed across three pillars:

  • Adequacy (40%)*

    Delivering meaningful retirement incomes today
  • Sustainability (35%)*

    Remaining resilient for tomorrow
  • Integrity (25%)*

    Earning the confidence of those who depend on it
* Percentages here correspond to the weighting given to the overall score.

Together, they capture the balance every pension system must strike. The report evaluates each system across more than 50 indicators to provide actionable insights.

Each year, the index also features a deep dive into a topical issue. In 2026, the focus is on the impact of ageing populations on pension systems and how policy responses to demographic challenges can help develop sustainable retirement income policies in the long run.

Browse through the report below to discover more about the analysis and each benchmarked retirement income system.

This year’s A-grade retirement income systems

This year's A-grade retirement income systems rank: The Netherlands with an index score of 85.5, Denmark with 84.1, Iceland with 84.0, Singapore with 82.0, Israel with 81.9 and Australia with 80.6 MCGPI A Grades

Top 3 rated systems for each sub-index

  • Adequacy

    How much do you get? 

    1. Kuwait
    2. The Netherlands
    3. France

  • Sustainability

    Can the system keep delivering?

    1. Denmark
    2. Iceland
    3. The Netherlands

  • Integrity

    Can the system be trusted?

    1. Finland
    2. Norway
    3. Singapore

People are living longer, work is changing, and the pressures on retirement income systems are growing. The question is no longer whether systems need to evolve, but how quickly and how effectively they can do so.
Tim Jenkins

Lead author, Partner, Marsh, Investments and Retirement

View the full 2026 report

Download the full report, including the feature chapter and changes from 2025 to 2026.

Overall grade for each retirement income system

MCGPI A Grades MCGPI A Grades
  • China C+ (60.6 ▲)
  • Hong Kong SAR B (71.2 ▲)
  • India D (46.8 ▲)
  • Indonesia C (50.7 ▼)
  • Japan C (58.0 ▲)
  • Korea (South) C (56.4 ▲)
  • Malaysia C+ (61.1 ▲)
  • Philippines D (49.2 ▲)
  • Singapore A (82.0 ▲)
  • Taiwan C (59.7 ▲)
  • Thailand C (52.2 ▲)
  • Vietnam C (54.6 ▲)

  • Austria C (56.9 ▲)
  • Belgium B (68.1 ▼)
  • Croatia B (66.1 ▼)
  • Denmark A (84.1 ▲)
  • Finland B+ (77.6 ▲)
  • France B (70.3 =)
  • Germany B (67.9 ▲)
  • Iceland A (84.0 =)
  • Ireland B (69.7 ▲)
  • Italy C (57.4 ▲)
  • Netherlands A (85.8 ▲)
  • Norway B+ (77.0 ▲)
  • Poland C (58.4 ▲)
  • Portugal B (67.3 ▼)
  • Spain C+ (63.3 ▼)
  • Sweden B+ (78.8 ▲)
  • Switzerland B (73.6 ▲)
  • United Kingdom B (71.6 ▼)

  • Botswana C (57.0 ▼)
  • Israel A (81.9 ▲)
  • Kazakhstan C+ (64.8 ▼)
  • Kenya C (53.1)
  • Kuwait B (72.9 ▲)
  • Namibia C (57.5 ▼)
  • Oman B (69.9 ▲)
  • Qatar B (66.0)
  • Saudi Arabia B (73.2 ▲)
  • South Africa C (50.4 ▼)
  • Türkiye D (46.6 ▼)
  • United Arab Emirates B (70.0 ▲)

 

  • Argentina D (43.7 ▼)
  • Brazil C (57.0 ▲)
  • Chile B+ (79.2 ▲)
  • Colombia C+ (63.3 ▲)
  • Dominican Republic C+ (61.4)
  • Mexico B (71.2 ▲)
  • Panama C+ (62.0 ▲) 
  • Peru C (55.7 ▲)
  • Uruguay B (69.7 ▼)

  • Australia A (80.6 ▲)
  • New Zealand B (71.4 ▲)

  • Canada B (70.6 ▲)
  • United States of America C+ (61.6 ▲)

A brief review of each system

Explore a summary of each retirement system, their strengths, and potential areas for improvement.

The impact of ageing populations on pension systems

Many nations are facing an ageing population due to falling birth rates and increasing life expectancies. These demographic changes have profound long-term implications for pension systems:

  1. Potentially increased costs of pension provision as individuals live longer,
  2. Funding pressures as working age populations proportionately decrease,
  3. The need for more flexible pension designs to accommodate phased retirement and non-traditional employment, 
  4. Intergenerational tensions as adequacy and sustainability of systems are reviewed, 
  5. Shifts in pension fund investment strategies as a greater proportion of the US$70 trillion in global pension fund assets moves toward defensive positioning.

Policymakers who recognise these demographic consequences have a window of opportunity to implement evidence-based policy responses, which we detail in our report.

The central insight is straightforward: demography is our destiny, but policy responses are choices. While demographic changes are inevitable, the path forward is not predetermined.

Retirement systems differ across markets, but all face the same long-term challenge: Delivering reliable income as demographics shift and markets change.
Mona Naqvi

Managing Director, CFA Institute Research and Policy Center

See also: Supplementary report

Explore further how we calculate the Index in our supplementary report on MercerInsight® Community.

See also: Supplementary report

Explore more about how we calculate the Index in our new supplementary report on MercerInsight® Community.

Meet our lead author and contributors

      Related solutions
      Related insights