A new chapter begins
Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2025
An analysis and ranking of 52 pension systems around the world
Retirement systems globally grow more resilient
The Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index benchmarks 52 retirement income systems worldwide, spotlighting both challenges and opportunities for policymakers and investors. This year’s index expands with Kuwait, Namibia, Oman, and Panama added, incorporates updated OECD data, and introduces new integrity measures for sharper insights. Systems are assessed across three pillars, adequacy, sustainability, and integrity, using more than 50 indicators. In 2025, the Netherlands, Iceland, Denmark, Singapore and Israel all achieved coveted A-grades, with Singapore making history as the first Asian country to reach that standard. With eight upgrades and no downgrades, the results signal a long-term trend of strengthening resilience in pension systems globally.
Each year, the index also features a deep dive into a topical issue. In 2025, the focus is on the delicate balance governments face when encouraging private pension funds to invest in areas of national priority, raising important questions at the intersection of policy and retirement security.
Download the report below to discover more about the analysis and your pension system.
This year’s top rated pension systems
Netherlands
Index: 85.4
Rating: A
Iceland
Index: 84.0
Rating: A
Denmark
Index: 82.3
Rating: A
Top 3 rated systems for each sub-index
-
Adequacy
How much do you get?
1. Kuwait
2. Netherlands
3. France -
Sustainability
Can the system keep delivering?
1. Iceland
2. Denmark
3. Netherlands -
Integrity
Can the system be trusted?
1. Finland
2. Singapore
3. Hong Kong SAR
Instead of imposing mandates, governments should focus on making investment options attractive, promoting transparency and sound governance, and fostering collaboration with the private sector to support sustainable retirement systems and economic growth.
Lead author, Actuary and Senior Partner, Mercer
Overall rating for each pension system
- China [56.7] ▲
- Hong Kong SAR [70.6] ▲
- India [43.8] ▼
- Indonesia [51.0] ▲
- Japan [56.3] ▲
- Korea [53.9] ▲
- Malaysia [60.6] ▲
- Philippines [47.1] ▲
- Singapore [80.8] ▲
- Taiwan [51.8] ▼
- Thailand [50.6] ▲
- Vietnam [53.7] ▼
- Austria [54.5] ▲
- Belgium [69.2] ▲
- Croatia [68.7] ▲
- Denmark [82.3] ▲
- Finland [76.6] ▲
- France [70.3] ▲
- Germany [67.8] ▲
- Iceland [84.0] ▲
- Ireland [67.7] ▼
- Italy [57.0] ▲
- Netherlands [85.4] ▲
- Norway [76.0] ▲
- Poland [57.0] ▲
- Portugal [67.6] ▲
- Spain [63.8] ▲
- Sweden [78.2] ▲
- Switzerland [72.4] ▲
- United Kingdom [72.2] ▲
- Botswana [59.8]
- Israel [80.3] ▲
- Kazakhstan [65.0] ▲
- Kuwait [71.9]
- Namibia [59.1]
- Oman [60.9]
- Saudi Arabia [67.6] ▲
- South Africa [51.0] ▲
- Turkey [48.2] ▼
- United Arab Emirates [64.9] ▲
- Argentina [45.9] ▲
- Brazil [56.2] ▲
- Chile [76.6] ▲
- Colombia [62.5] ▼
- Mexico [69.3] ▲
- Panama [59.1]
- Peru [55.3] ▲
- Uruguay [71.1] ▲
- Australia [77.6] ▲
- New Zealand [70.4] ▲
- Canada [70.4] ▲
- United States of America [61.1] ▲
Balancing government influence on private pension fund investments
With governments around the world considering how to adopt measures to regulate, restrict, or influence private pension fund investments, this year’s feature chapter reviews current policies, the rationale behind them, and the principles that can guide a balance between serving pension plan participants and advancing broader national interests.
In many countries, governments impose direct or indirect restrictions on pension fund assets. The OECD noted in 2022 that only a minority of countries impose no ceilings, relying solely on the prudent person principle. Recent debates have also highlighted the role of pension funds in supporting long-term societal and economic goals, prompting governments to consider encouraging domestic investment in areas of national priority.
This chapter reviews these restrictions and their alignment with the fundamental objective of serving participants’ best interests. It also proposes eight principles to guide collaboration between governments and the pension industry:
- The primary purpose of pension funds is to provide retirement income to the fund’s participants and their dependents
- Trustees and fiduciaries must act in the best interests of the pension fund’s beneficiaries
- Pension legislation should require all pension funds to develop a comprehensive investment policy and to have sound investment governance practices
- Pension funds must consider the full range of available investment opportunities, recognizing that available opportunities are impacted by a country’s economic development
- Governments can make particular investments attractive to pension funds without the use of compulsion and should refrain from requiring a ‘floor’ level of investment in a particular asset class. The actual investment decision should be left to the pension fund
- Pension funds should collaborate together and with government to increase investment opportunities in areas where pension funds may not otherwise have the scale or risk appetite to invest; e.g. infrastructure projects through public private partnerships
- There should be transparent public disclosure relating to the actual investments held, their returns and risks, but no performance tests or fee caps applied to pension fund investments
- When private pension fund assets are a significant percentage of GDP, governments must recognize the impact and interactions between their fiscal and social policies and the implications for present and future retirees
Pension systems work best when they balance innovation and national priorities with the enduring responsibility to serve end-investors' interests.
CFA, President & CEO, CFA Institute
Meet our lead author and contributors
References to Mercer shall be construed to include Mercer Financial Services Middle East Limited and/or its associated companies.
© 2023 Mercer Financial Services Middle East Limited. All rights reserved.
This content may not be modified, sold or otherwise provided, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity without Mercer's prior written permission.
Mercer does not provide tax or legal advice. You should contact your tax advisor, accountant and/or attorney before making any decisions with tax or legal implications.
This does not constitute an offer to purchase or sell any securities.
The findings, ratings and/or opinions expressed herein are the intellectual property of Mercer and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to convey any guarantees as to the future performance of the investment products, asset classes or capital markets discussed.
This does not contain investment advice relating to your particular circumstances. No investment decision should be made based on this information without first obtaining appropriate professional advice and considering your circumstances. Mercer provides recommendations based on the particular client's circumstances, investment objectives and needs. As such, investment results will vary and actual results may differ materially.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and you may not get back the amount you have invested. Investments denominated in a foreign currency will fluctuate with the value of the currency. Certain investments, such as securities issued by small capitalization, foreign and emerging market issuers, real property, and illiquid, leveraged or high-yield funds, carry additional risks that should be considered before choosing an investment manager or making an investment decision.
Information contained herein may have been obtained from a range of third party sources. While the information is believed to be reliable, Mercer has not sought to verify it independently. As such, Mercer makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of the information presented and takes no responsibility or liability (including for indirect, consequential, or incidental damages) for any error, omission or inaccuracy in the data supplied by any third party.
For the most recent approved ratings of an investment strategy, and a fuller explanation of their meanings, contact your Mercer representative.
Mercer universes: Mercer’s universes are intended to provide collective samples of strategies that best allow for robust peer group comparisons over a chosen timeframe. Mercer does not assert that the peer groups are wholly representative of and applicable to all strategies available to investors.
Please see the following link for information on investment management index definitions.
Not all services mentioned are available in all jurisdictions. Please contact your Mercer representative for more information.
In the United Arab Emirates, Mercer’s Services are delivered by Mercer Financial Services Middle East Limited (“MFSMEL”). MFSMEL is registered with the DIFC, License No. 0939 and regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA).
For the conflict of interest statement of Mercer Investments, of which MFSMEL is a part, contact your Mercer representative or see https://www.mercer.com/conflictsofinterest.