Matt Scott
Matt Scott
Investment Research - Lead Specialist

Mercer’s Matt Scott says we are now seeing the narratives that Bitcoin enthusiasts have relied on beginning to fail. At the same time as the digital currency flagship flounders, regulatory scrutiny increases. But Web 3.0 could hold a bright future for cryptos.


Since the launch of Bitcoin over a decade ago, decentralised digital currencies, aka cryptocurrencies have captured imaginations and rocketed in value despite frequent and massive crashes. 

Bitcoin’s shiny allure has attracted swathes of investors in recent years but the more we unwrap it layer by layer, the more we are disappointed by its interior.

We are starting to see some of the narratives that Bitcoin enthusiasts have relied on begin to collapse.

No longer an inflation hedge

Bitcoin has been widely touted as an inflation hedge because there is a limit on how many coins can be mined – similar to gold which is often perceived as a safe-haven asset when consumer prices are rising. 

This “digital gold” narrative gained significant traction in 2021 due to simultaneous ETF flows out of gold and a great year for cryptocurrencies, which was interpreted as a shift in power to the new kid on the block.

Unlike Bitcoin and gold, which are perceived to have finite resources, central banks and governments are relatively unhindered in their ability to expand the monetary base. Seigniorage is the amount of economic advantage a government gains from printing money; the concept behind crypto is to both limit and democratize seignorage.  

But investors should not rely on the limit on 21 million Bitcoins set by the originator of the blockchain, Satoshi Nakamoto, as the reality is it can be changed whenever the developer community decides to.

We strongly believe the comparison of Bitcoin with gold has been much overplayed. In recent months, the notion of Bitcoin being an inflation hedge has been dented as its price has collapsed while inflation continues to rise. 

According to CoinDesk, the price of the world’s most famous cryptocurrency reached a peak of $67,554 last November, but this year has fallen by a staggering 54% from $47,739 on 1 January to $20,881 on 17 June.

To some extent this has been a case of “The Emperor’s New Clothes”, where Bitcoin’s credentials as a diversifier or store of value have been impaired. However the boom town of Decentralized Finance has also been to blame. When investors were being offered as much as 18% returns to lend US stablecoin Terra speculative finance precedents such as Icelandic banks spring to mind quite easily.

High lending rates in the space have in part been based on the premise that collateral prices only ever go up. For example, if I borrow stable coins at a 15% interest rate and I buy Bitcoin with it and the price of Bitcoin goes up by 50%, then the latter easily covers the amount of interest I have to pay.

This is reminiscent of speculative finance in the global financial crisis where a lot of lending was predicated on the idea that property prices would go up forever. As we discovered in the crisis, when there is a problem, the whole thing blows up.

We believe cryptos have been pure speculative assets – there are no substantial real economic returns from the space and a rather flimsy set of use cases supporting it. 

Floods of speculative investors appear to have propped up the price of cryptocurrencies in recent years – but these ‘pump and dump’ type of investments now seem to have run their course. To keep speculative price rises going requires successive waves of investors to enter the system – but it feels like the search for greater fools is getting harder. This is of course, assuming that there is no explosion in usefulness coming down the line… (I come to Web 3.0 later).


MercerInsight® Community

Connecting investors for richer insights.

Join our community for complimentary access to Mercer's latest insights and those of the broader asset management industry. Everything you need in one place to help you make informed decisions about your investments.



Regulation is still the major threat to cryptos

While the industry remains both under-regulated and patchily regulated, many watchdogs around the world are nevertheless keeping a close eye on cryptos and ramping up their capabilities. The huge amount of speculative finance in cryptos and the problems the sector has faced recently will almost certainly draw closer scrutiny from regulators. The March Executive Order from President Biden was a welcome call for a whole-of-government approach for regulating and stewarding the crypto space, it should lead to a more sustainable trajectory whilst also exposing pockets of systemic risk and malpractice.

There is too much market manipulation in the sector – for example wash trading. This is where trades are executed by investors, illegally acting as both the buyer and the seller of the asset to make it look like the network is more active than it is. There has been some regulatory action in the US by the CFTC on crypto wash trading, however jurisdictional questions remain (some have challenged whether CFTC’s enforcement scope extends to crypto, and there is a lack of clarity over the precise geographic location of transactions on the blockchain occur).

Increased regulatory proximity to the digital ecosystem, an accelerating legislative timetable, as well as an uptick in resourcing would mean that the level of artificial volumes in the space are unlikely to persist. 

Although the government regulates, it also competes. One reason why regulators have not come down on the sector yet is because governments haven't perceived their own currencies to be under threat, simply put they don’t see any current blockchains as scalable competitors or as replacement “numeraires”. But if governments decide they do not want to give away seigniorage and take action, then we could see a wholesale taming of the sector in the future.

Web 3.0: Decentralised internet on blockchain

For cryptos to have a genuine benefit, they must be improving people’s lives and creating real value. That’s why venture capitalists are getting excited about Web 3.0 – the third generation of the internet where the system will be decentralised using blockchain technology. 

Under the current generation, Web 2.0, databases and apps are hosted on centralised servers but with Web 3.0, apps will be hosted on blockchains and decentralised data networks. 

While Bitcoin is seen as a store of value or payment system, it is likely to be Ethereum, the decentralized open-source blockchain system (host to the token Ether), that will provide the base layer for this Web 3.0. concept.

If the theory that decentralised systems are inherently more robust than their centralized competitors, then crypto is about to come to life, and there will be a lot of money to be made from Web 3.0. Whilst it’s hard to see how Web 3.0 concepts can be applied to marketplaces that rely on real world infrastructure, or social networks with their huge private data moats, there are some encouraging examples of use cases, for example in gaming.

Interestingly, the price falls of various major cryptocurrencies since highs in November 2021 follows a very similar path to the NASDAQ index of leading technology firms. This suggests that cryptos are acting like tech stocks, and that is because the future of the system heavily relies on Web 3.0. The third generation of the internet will clearly need a lot of institutional money for it to really take off. 

Whilst the trajectories of Web 3.0 and cryptocurrencies are linked, they are not necessarily intrinsically so. Does web 3.0 actually need free-float cryptocurrencies or could it rely on Central Bank Digital Currencies? This may be one reason why the more cautious investors in the space rely diversify cryptocurrency exposure, with crypto venture capital and equity ownership.

The crypto sector faces many risks beyond the turbulent events of recent weeks and months. But if Web 3.0, where the next phase of the internet is decentralised using blockchain technology, really takes off, this could provide vast opportunity at a compelling price. Lack of regulation and compelling use cases are keeping most institutional investors away for the time being.

Important Notices


References to Mercer shall be construed to include Mercer LLC and/or its associated companies.


© 2022 Mercer LLC. All rights reserved.


This content may not be modified, sold or otherwise provided, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity without Mercer's prior written permission.


Mercer does not provide tax or legal advice. You should contact your tax advisor, accountant and/or attorney before making any decisions with tax or legal implications.


This does not constitute an offer to purchase or sell any securities.


The findings, ratings and/or opinions expressed herein are the intellectual property of Mercer and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to convey any guarantees as to the future performance of the investment products, asset classes or capital markets discussed.


For Mercer’s conflict of interest disclosures, contact your Mercer representative or view here.


This does not contain investment advice relating to your particular circumstances. No investment decision should be made based on this information without first obtaining appropriate professional advice and considering your circumstances. Mercer provides recommendations based on the particular client's circumstances, investment objectives and needs. As such, investment results will vary and actual results may differ materially.


Information contained herein may have been obtained from a range of third party sources. While the information is believed to be reliable, Mercer has not sought to verify it independently. As such, Mercer makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of the information presented and takes no responsibility or liability (including for indirect, consequential, or incidental damages) for any error, omission or inaccuracy in the data supplied by any third party.


Funds of private capital funds are speculative and involve a high degree of risk. Private capital fund managers have total authority over the private capital funds. The use of a single advisor applying similar strategies could mean lack of diversification and, consequentially, higher risk. Funds of private capital funds are not liquid and require investors to commit to funding capital calls over a period of several years; any default on a capital call may result in substantial penalties and/or legal action. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. There are restrictions on transferring interests in private capital funds. Funds of private capital funds’ fees and expenses may offset private capital funds’ profits. Funds of private capital funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors. Funds of private capital funds may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Funds of private capital funds are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds. Fund offering may only be made through a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM).


Not all services mentioned are available in all jurisdictions. Please contact your Mercer representative for more information.


Investment management and advisory services for U.S. clients are provided by Mercer Investments LLC (Mercer Investments). Mercer Investments LLC is registered to do business as “Mercer Investment Advisers LLC” in the following states: Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and West Virginia; as “Mercer Investments LLC (Delaware)” in Georgia; as “Mercer Investments LLC of Delaware” in Louisiana; and “Mercer Investments LLC, a limited liability company of Delaware” in Oregon. Mercer Investments LLC is a federally registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. Mercer Investments’ Form ADV Part 2A & 2B can be obtained by written request directed to:  Compliance Department, Mercer Investments 99 High Street, Boston, MA 02110.


Certain regulated services in Europe are provided by Mercer Global Investments Europe Limited and Mercer Limited.


Mercer Global Investments Europe Limited and Mercer Limited are regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland under the European Union (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulation 2017, as an investment firm. Registered officer: Charlotte House, Charlemont Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Registered in Ireland No. 416688. Mercer Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales No. 984275. Registered Office: 1 Tower Place West, Tower Place, London EC3R 5BU.


Investment management services for Canadian investors are provided by Mercer Global Investments Canada Limited. Investment consulting services for Canadian investors are provided by Mercer (Canada) Limited.