As the investment landscape grows more complex, an increasing number of not-for profits investors are turning to third parties to act as chief investment officers. Richard Williams, the finance director at one of the Church of England Diocese of Rochester, and George Dyer, executive director at the US-based International Endowments Network, joined our NFP investment podcast to discuss the issues.

Outsourcing Chief Investment Officer (OCIO), Fiduciary Management, Implemented Consulting – these are just some of the terms associated with the outsourcing of investment functions, which is a growing phenomenon. The Mercer Global NFP Investment Survey found 70% of endowments are using external investment support for their portfolio.

Increasing complexity is a key driver, with 44% of NFP investors saying their portfolios are now more complex than three years ago. The rising importance of the ESG agenda has added urgency and further complexity while the demand to diversify into private or alternative assets requires new skills and understanding.

Outsourcing and control

Richard Williams, the finance director at the Church of England Diocese of Rochester, explained how, in the past off-the-shelf solutions had been effective – seeking one or two funds with a good performance record and a strategy aligned with the diocese’s aims and values.

However, Williams said that came with restrictions. “Sometimes you might stick with the same fund managers, but in that context, you're stuck with that fund manager and its performance for a lengthy period of time.”

“For five years, you have no influence over its asset allocation and no influence over its ESG. So, whilst it's off the shelf, there are limitations and frustrations in the inability to really control what's going on,” said Williams.

Whether outsourcing to a chief investment officer or adopting a fiduciary management solution provides increases or decreases control is a key feature of the outsourcing – the answer is not necessarily black or white.

George Dyer is executive director at the US-based International Endowments Network, a peer-learning network that connects professionals across NFP investing from trustees to asset managers and advisers. Overall, Dyer is positive about the benefits, arguing it allows the board to spend more time and resources on the strategic issues. In effect, giving the board the ability to focus more on the values of the endowment, its aims and objectives, and less on administration.


MercerInsight® Community

Connecting investors for richer insights.

Join our community for complimentary access to Mercer's latest insights and those of the broader asset management industry. Everything you need in one place to help you make informed decisions about your investments.



Lightening the load

The NFP Investment Survey found that reporting and administration, strategic asset allocation, and selecting and monitoring managers were key reasons for Outsourcing Chief Investment Officer (OCIO) with between 70% and 80% of those who had outsourced naming one or more of these as a reason for their decision.

“We've seen a lot of the endowments that we work with implement or move to an outsourced model, particularly what we would consider the small- and medium-sized endowments with under a billion or so,’ said Dyer. ‘One of the key reasons we've seen for that is that it opens up more time for that kind of governance level strategic decision making around concepts like ESG and mission alignment,’ he added.

This was exactly the benefit that the Diocese of Rochester found with its outsourcing approach, according to Williams. “We discovered that not only did we have the ability to control the asset allocation and determine the variance of the return that we were aiming for, but also the actual area of ESG,” he said, adding: “We were able to stay within the asset allocation where we wanted the focus to be, and particularly on equity on sustainability.”

Enabling private market investment

A growing interest in diversifying assets has also helped to drive the outsourcing trend. Private market investments are a growing proportion of many institutional investment portfolios. The Mercer NFP Investment Survey found that, among funds that had chosen OCIO, 30% had done so to help implement a private markets strategy.

“We were able to say there's an option of putting 15% in private equity specifically aimed at health care and climate change and sustainability,” says Williams. “It was aligned with our own values and our own objectives, and had very strong returns. It has given us much more input into where we want to put our money, but also into the choice of the fund managers.”

Outsourcing investment advice or implementation, either fully or partly, is a rapidly evolving trend in NFP investment and there is no ‘one-size fits all’ solution. However, as Williams and Dyer agree, when done right, outsourcing can deliver a double, and perhaps unexpected, benefit of reducing workload and complexity while also providing greater control over the key aims and objectives of an endowment.

Important Notices


References to Mercer shall be construed to include Mercer LLC and/or its associated companies.


© 2022 Mercer LLC. All rights reserved.


This content may not be modified, sold or otherwise provided, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity without Mercer's prior written permission.


Mercer does not provide tax or legal advice. You should contact your tax advisor, accountant and/or attorney before making any decisions with tax or legal implications.


This does not constitute an offer to purchase or sell any securities.


The findings, ratings and/or opinions expressed herein are the intellectual property of Mercer and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to convey any guarantees as to the future performance of the investment products, asset classes or capital markets discussed.


For Mercer’s conflict of interest disclosures, contact your Mercer representative or view here.


This does not contain investment advice relating to your particular circumstances. No investment decision should be made based on this information without first obtaining appropriate professional advice and considering your circumstances. Mercer provides recommendations based on the particular client's circumstances, investment objectives and needs. As such, investment results will vary and actual results may differ materially.


Information contained herein may have been obtained from a range of third party sources. While the information is believed to be reliable, Mercer has not sought to verify it independently. As such, Mercer makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of the information presented and takes no responsibility or liability (including for indirect, consequential, or incidental damages) for any error, omission or inaccuracy in the data supplied by any third party.


Funds of private capital funds are speculative and involve a high degree of risk. Private capital fund managers have total authority over the private capital funds. The use of a single advisor applying similar strategies could mean lack of diversification and, consequentially, higher risk. Funds of private capital funds are not liquid and require investors to commit to funding capital calls over a period of several years; any default on a capital call may result in substantial penalties and/or legal action. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. There are restrictions on transferring interests in private capital funds. Funds of private capital funds’ fees and expenses may offset private capital funds’ profits. Funds of private capital funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors. Funds of private capital funds may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Funds of private capital funds are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds. Fund offering may only be made through a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM).


Not all services mentioned are available in all jurisdictions. Please contact your Mercer representative for more information.


Investment management and advisory services for U.S. clients are provided by Mercer Investments LLC (Mercer Investments). Mercer Investments LLC is registered to do business as “Mercer Investment Advisers LLC” in the following states: Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and West Virginia; as “Mercer Investments LLC (Delaware)” in Georgia; as “Mercer Investments LLC of Delaware” in Louisiana; and “Mercer Investments LLC, a limited liability company of Delaware” in Oregon. Mercer Investments LLC is a federally registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. Mercer Investments’ Form ADV Part 2A & 2B can be obtained by written request directed to:  Compliance Department, Mercer Investments 99 High Street, Boston, MA 02110.


Certain regulated services in Europe are provided by Mercer Global Investments Europe Limited and Mercer Limited.


Mercer Global Investments Europe Limited and Mercer Limited are regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland under the European Union (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulation 2017, as an investment firm. Registered officer: Charlotte House, Charlemont Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Registered in Ireland No. 416688. Mercer Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales No. 984275. Registered Office: 1 Tower Place West, Tower Place, London EC3R 5BU.


Investment management services for Canadian investors are provided by Mercer Global Investments Canada Limited. Investment consulting services for Canadian investors are provided by Mercer (Canada) Limited.