Ageing demographics, contrasting forms of governance and the race to become the next tech superpower are just some of the factors investors will have to consider in the decades to come.

Rather than exploring the investment case for Chinese or US equities in isolation, there is a need for investors to understand some of the structural forces that will shape the two economies in the years ahead to help decide where to invest capital.

That was one of the few areas of agreement between Rosanna Burcheri, portfolio manager at Fidelity International and Philip Saunders, co-head of multi-asset growth at Ninety One, in a debate I had the pleasure of moderating, held at Mercer’s Global Investment Forum (GIF) Europe in Barcelona last month.

Prior to the debate, I presented the Forum’s attendees with a question: if they were given 2% more capital for their equity allocation, would they use it to overweight US equities or China equities (A-shares) over a 5-year time horizon?

The results revealed a fairly even split, with 46% of attendees opting to overweight US equities, while 54% leaned towards China equities.

With speakers eager to pitch their arguments, and attentive listeners primed to revisit the question at the debate’s conclusion, Barcelona was set for a clash of the world’s largest markets.

Shifting demographics

The year 2030 will mark a demographic turning point for the United States, Saunders told the GIF – all baby boomers will be older than 65, expanding the size of the older population, with one in every five Americans projected to be at retirement age, according to the United States Census Bureau.

By 2060, nearly one in four Americans are projected to be 65 years and older, and while this represents an issue over the longer term, the US’s growing population means there will be more working-age people than ever over the coming decades.

And as Burcheri told Mercer’s GIF, working-age people are the “driver of growth in the economy” and the “pillar of productivity,” yet China’s workforce is set to drop by 35 million over the next five years alone.

China’s working-age population fell by 40 million in the 10 years to 2020 and now accounts for approximately 70% per cent of the population, according to the World Bank.

Yet the apparent success of Xi Jinping’s economic reforms can best be seen in the emergence of a new, digital middle class, Saunders retorted.

“The middle class in China will double over the next decade to about 600 million people, and that's significant,” he said. Combined with this a rural population of roughly 550 million becoming increasingly connected with the digital economy have “significant scope to move to cities,” Saunders said. Urbanisation, a key factor in China’s economic growth, is not dead.

Land of the free and fragile

Ronald Reagan once said: The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the Government and I’m here to help” – and that sentiment has been encapsulated by the US financial markets to some extent, aiding investors. Yet the guiding hand of government is shaping the US to provide investors with security and stability, Burcheri argued.

“The US is a very pro-business country,” she added, pointing toward three factors that attract investors: governance, property and freedom.

“The protection of physical property is what nurtures economic stability,” she said, with the affordance of security being used to “fuel innovation and to modernise the economy.”

She added that investors may be more comfortable putting their money in a country like the US where the rule of law is critically important.

Conversely, America’s politics are “fractured,” Saunders reasoned, reflecting “deeper problems in society”.

“We've got a dangerous situation whereby financialisation causes inequality, and it means it has to be sustained by very low real interest rates. That is not capitalism working particularly well in my book, and it's self-feeding.

“We have got something that doesn't look vulnerable, but actually, it's an increasingly fragile system,” he claimed.


Redrawing the investments map together

Global Investment Forums 2022

Europe | US | Pacific | Asia | Canada

The next tech superpower

While Saunders acknowledged the future dynamics of China’s economy are hard to predict accurately, owing to the close alignment with state policy, there is a case to be made for investments in China’s onshore equity market, namely in technology.

A clear signpost for this, Saunders argued, has been the Chinese government’s ambition to become the world’s leading technology economy, encompassing domestic research, design and manufacturing.

Additionally, China’s onshore market has a low correlation with other equity markets, providing a degree of diversification to investors, he added.

Saunders reasoned that the Chinese government is entering a “Sputnik period” of investment in technological research that will filter through to the private sector. Much like how US government-funded technology was critical to the design and production of the iPhone – to the benefit of Apple shareholders – the next wave of research and development in China may come to benefit tech start-ups located in Shenzhen rather than California.

This leads to a situation where US dominance in this area may be “set to erode as the rest of the world catches up,” Saunders stated, reshaping the global technology landscape.

On the face of it, American technology and communication businesses are outperforming their Chinese counterparts – at least in a very general sense. Yet the competition to become the next tech superpower is a global battle and Chinese businesses such as Huawei are leading the charge through the ‘Digital Silk Road’ – an initiative to meet the global demand for technology and connectivity.

Saunders pointed to Baidu, sometimes referred to as the “Google of China”, as it has 130 partners for its autonomous vehicle platform, including European carmakers, and is a clear symbol of Chinese technology’s encroachment into Western business.

Yet there will always be the argument of the American market’s ability to consistently deliver returns for investors, and as Burcheri explained, all under the protection of a government that seeks to promote private entrepreneurship.

While the next evolution of the technology market is hard to predict, Burcheri claimed it will be a very long time before the US market is categorically replaced as the world’s leading technology hub.

Where should your money go?

As Saunders said, China is increasingly becoming a legitimate investment opportunity, with a constructive long-term macroeconomic backdrop and an onshore equity market growing in reputation, priced at attractive relative and absolute valuations. Structural and social fragilities in the US may be underappreciated by some investors, but the US equity market has demonstrated its capability of delivering growth and value to investors, as Burcheri explained.

Compelling arguments, certainly, but it was the voice and views of attendees that mattered the most at this debate.

In the second round of polling GIF attendees remained quite evenly split between the two options. 47% of attendees would overweight US equities, while 53% would opt for Chinese stocks.

Despite a small swing towards the US, it is clear that a decision between US and Chinese equities is nuanced, and how this real-world decision may play out in the future remains to be seen.

Simon Coxeter
Simon Coxeter
Strategic Research Director, AMEA & Latin America

Important Notices


References to Mercer shall be construed to include Mercer LLC and/or its associated companies.


© 2022 Mercer LLC. All rights reserved.


This content may not be modified, sold or otherwise provided, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity without Mercer's prior written permission.


Mercer does not provide tax or legal advice. You should contact your tax advisor, accountant and/or attorney before making any decisions with tax or legal implications.


This does not constitute an offer to purchase or sell any securities.


The findings, ratings and/or opinions expressed herein are the intellectual property of Mercer and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to convey any guarantees as to the future performance of the investment products, asset classes or capital markets discussed.


For Mercer’s conflict of interest disclosures, contact your Mercer representative or see


This does not contain investment advice relating to your particular circumstances. No investment decision should be made based on this information without first obtaining appropriate professional advice and considering your circumstances. Mercer provides recommendations based on the particular client's circumstances, investment objectives and needs. As such, investment results will vary and actual results may differ materially.


Information contained herein may have been obtained from a range of third party sources. While the information is believed to be reliable, Mercer has not sought to verify it independently. As such, Mercer makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of the information presented and takes no responsibility or liability (including for indirect, consequential, or incidental damages) for any error, omission or inaccuracy in the data supplied by any third party.


Funds of private capital funds are speculative and involve a high degree of risk. Private capital fund managers have total authority over the private capital funds. The use of a single advisor applying similar strategies could mean lack of diversification and, consequentially, higher risk. Funds of private capital funds are not liquid and require investors to commit to funding capital calls over a period of several years; any default on a capital call may result in substantial penalties and/or legal action. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. There are restrictions on transferring interests in private capital funds. Funds of private capital funds’ fees and expenses may offset private capital funds’ profits. Funds of private capital funds are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors. Funds of private capital funds may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information. Funds of private capital funds are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds. Fund offering may only be made through a Private Placement Memorandum (PPM).


Not all services mentioned are available in all jurisdictions. Please contact your Mercer representative for more information.


Investment management and advisory services for U.S. clients are provided by Mercer Investments LLC (Mercer Investments). Mercer Investments LLC is registered to do business as “Mercer Investment Advisers LLC” in the following states: Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and West Virginia; as “Mercer Investments LLC (Delaware)” in Georgia; as “Mercer Investments LLC of Delaware” in Louisiana; and “Mercer Investments LLC, a limited liability company of Delaware” in Oregon. Mercer Investments LLC is a federally registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. Mercer Investments’ Form ADV Part 2A & 2B can be obtained by written request directed to:  Compliance Department, Mercer Investments 99 High Street, Boston, MA 02110.


Certain regulated services in Europe are provided by Mercer Global Investments Europe Limited and Mercer Limited.


Mercer Global Investments Europe Limited and Mercer Limited are regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland under the European Union (Markets in Financial Instruments) Regulation 2017, as an investment firm. Registered officer: Charlotte House, Charlemont Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Registered in Ireland No. 416688. Mercer Limited is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales No. 984275. Registered Office: 1 Tower Place West, Tower Place, London EC3R 5BU.


Investment management services for Canadian investors are provided by Mercer Global Investments Canada Limited. Investment consulting services for Canadian investors are provided by Mercer (Canada) Limited.