Mercer is now Marsh.

Why AI investment is outrunning impact, and ways to close the gap 

Organizations are investing heavily in AI, but many are still struggling to turn that investment into measurable impact.

One reason is becoming clear: most organizations can tell you who has access to AI, but far fewer can tell you who is using it well — or where AI is genuinely improving the work.
32%

of the C-suite say their workforce can effectively combine human and machine capabilities today

40%

of employees are concerned about losing their job to AI

Too often, AI is layered onto existing ways of working instead of being used to rethink the work itself. At the same time, broad, generic AI training misses the mark — it rarely builds the judgment, adaptability, and confidence people need to use AI effectively. Growing regulatory expectations are also adding more pressure, with organizations needing to build AI literacy and show evidence of the steps they’re taking. 

A different approach is needed — one that helps organizations build AI agility across the workforce and turn investment into real value.

What is AI agility?

AI agility is the ability to work effectively with AI — to collaborate with it, critically evaluate it, and apply it responsibly to solve new problems. 

But many organizations still treat AI use and AI capability as the same thing. They are not. Access and adoption matter, but they do not tell you whether people can adapt, apply judgment, and reshape work as AI changes the task. 

To understand AI agility clearly, organizations need to look across three levels at once:

How ready is each person to work with AI? This includes behavioral predisposition, cognitive ability, and current knowledge and skill. 

Which workflows are best suited to human-AI collaboration — and where should human judgment remain central? This is where individual capability starts to translate into stronger collective performance. 

How mature is the workforce’s AI capability across business units? Where are the high-readiness groups and the critical skill gaps, and how can functions — including HR — help drive the transition? 
Leadership is a unifying force across all three levels. Organizations need leaders with the mindset and skill to guide change, shape decisions, and build AI agility responsibly.
In this report, you’ll learn:
  • Where the real gap lies

    Why AI investment is not yet translating into impact, and the three barriers holding organizations back.
  • How to diagnose your organization

    A practical framework to assess AI agility at the individual, team, and organizational levels.
  • What to do next

    A three-step approach to measure capability, develop AI agility over time, and redesign work to optimize AI’s impact.
  • What progress looks like

    Examples of how different functions can move from AI adoption to meaningful, sustained AI agility.

Why AI agility is falling short

Three common barriers are getting in the way: 

When ownership of data, governance, and work redesign is split, AI adoption becomes inconsistent. Standards diverge, progress fragments, and value is harder to scale. 

Many organizations are tallying up licenses issued, prompts written, and bots deployed. Those numbers show usage — but they do not show whether work is improving, risk is being managed, or value is being created. 

With most new technologies, familiarity reduces anxiety. AI is different. For many employees, greater exposure raises new concerns because AI is beginning to affect parts of work once seen as uniquely human — including creativity, judgment, and sense-making. 
About the author(s)
Kate Bravery

Senior Partner, Workforce Global Leader

Related solutions
Related insights