DCSIMG
Mercer
Investment consulting

Contact: Nick Sykes
Tel: +44 (0)20 7178 3268

Email this page Print this page

Alternative Indexation

Last updated: 17 November 2011

 



 

QUICK LINKS

Introduction

The nature of market capitalisation - weighted index benchmarks

 Download full paper

Contact us

Departing from market capitalisation-weighted index-tracking investments – the case for value or fundamental indexation

Introduction

In our paper, Constructing a Better Global Equity Portfolio, we pointed out a number of disadvantages with the current, conventional approaches to equity portfolio construction. In this paper, we focus on the index-tracking approaches that will enable investors to avoid the particular issue of asset price bubbles that can occur in market cap-weighted indices.

The nature of market capitalisation - weighted index benchmarks

Market capitalisation-weighted indices clearly have some advantages:

 

  • Theoretically, they represent an appropriate broad market benchmark. If the Capital Asset-Pricing Model holds true, then a market cap-weighted index does represent the broad equity market beta that is available to be captured by investors.

     

  • They clearly represent the available opportunity set for investors (they are the only benchmark which every investor can hold simultaneously) and therefore, arguably, they are the most appropriate benchmark against which to compare the performance of active managers.

     

  • They are easy and cheap to track (not least because they do not require rebalancing other than for constituent changes). However, as we identified in our earlier paper, we believe that market cap-weighted index benchmarks have three significant flaws:

     

  1. They tend to be backward-looking (in theory, share prices are forward-looking but, in practice, they are anchored to past success).

     

  2. They are prone to risk of concentration.

     

  3. They are prone to mispricings or, at an extreme, asset price bubbles. Ever since the Dutch tulip bubble of the early seventeenth century, during which tulip contracts sold for more than 10 times the annual salary of a skilled craftsman – often defined as the first speculative bubble – it has been recognised that, as a whole, markets do not behave rationally. Their paths are occasionally dominated by “animal spirits” that swamp the influence of the rational, profit-maximising investors that the CAPM assumes are the only market participants. So, we know, and can observe, that at any number of different levels in the market (country, sector, size, style, company, etc.) the market will create mispricings and bubbles will appear.


Why is this of significance for market cap-weighted indices?


By their very nature, such indices will capture, in full, the effect of these asset price bubbles and we know that this effect leads to increased volatility and reduced return over the longer term. Simply put, a market cap-weighted index will hold its highest weighting in a share at the peak of that share’s price relative to the rest of the market (which also tends to be at the peak of that share’s valuation), so investors will be fully exposed to any bubbles when they burst. This is illustrated in the following chart.

 

TMT bubble

 

In this paper, we focus specifically on the issue of avoiding the effect of asset price bubbles, which has some overlap with the issue of concentrations of risk. The backward looking (or, rather, the anchoring to past success) flaw of market cap indices is not addressed here.

 

 

 Download full paper

 

Content includes:

 

  • Avoidance of asset price bubbles
  • Style impact - Value bias
  • Conclusion 

 

 

Mercer is a leading global provider of investment services, and offers customized guidance at every stage of the investment decision, risk management and investment monitoring process. We have been dedicated to meeting the needs of clients for more than 30 years, and we work with the fiduciaries of pension funds, foundations, endowments and other investors in some 35 countries. We assist with every aspect of institutional investing (and retail portfolios in some geographies), from strategy, structure and implementation to ongoing fiduciary management.

 

IMPORTANT NOTICES

Proprietary and confidential
References to Mercer shall be construed to include Mercer LLC and/or its associated companies.
This contains confidential and proprietary information of Mercer and is intended for the exclusive use of the parties to whom it was provided by Mercer. Its content may not be modified, sold or otherwise provided, in whole or in part, to any other person or entity, without Mercer's prior written permission.
Opinions – not guarantees
The findings, ratings and/or opinions expressed herein are the intellectual property of Mercer and are subject to change without notice. They are not intended to convey any guarantees as to the future performance of the investment products, asset classes or capital markets discussed. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Mercer’s ratings do not constitute individualized investment advice.
Not investment advice
This does not contain investment advice relating to your particular circumstances. No investment decision should be made based on this information without first obtaining appropriate professional advice and considering your circumstances.

 

Contact: Nick Sykes
Tel: +44 (0)20 7178 3268

Download

Alternative Indexation

Download full paper