Mercer

Perspective: Open-investment architecture: A logical step toward managing DC plan fees

Last updated: 29 May 2009

 

In the past several years, we have seen a series of high-profile lawsuits over 401(k) plan fees. Now, it appears likely a new administration will revisit, and possibly strengthen, proposed fee disclosure requirements or allow fee-related legislation to proceed.

 

The attention on defined contribution (DC) plan fees has been enormous, but is it warranted? When you consider the total amount of fees paid for servicing DC plans, the potential impact on employees and retirees, and the relatively scant attention that has previously been the norm, the answer is clearly yes.

What is at stake?

A typical midsized plan with $100 million in assets and 2,000 participants generally pays between 0.5 percent to 1 percent of assets, or up to $1 million per year, for total investment and administrative fees. For larger plans, the amount at stake is even greater.

 

DC plans depend on the valuable services provided by the organizations that manage the investments and service participants’ accounts. However, the bundling of these two services – where fees for plan administration and investment management are combined, and both are calculated as a percentage of assets – has created a scenario where administrative fees vary with asset levels and are not necessarily in line with costs.

 

Download the complete PDF of this Perspective in the right column

 


 


Download


Open-investment architecture: A logical step toward managing DC plan fees

Download PDF