|
The Central Provident Fund (CPF) was set up in 1955 to
provide financial security for workers in their retirement or when they are no
longer able to work. Over the years, it has evolved into a comprehensive Social
Security scheme, which aims not only at catering for a member’s retirement, but
also at taking into account home-ownership and health care needs.
A few years ago, the CPF underwent a fundamental review
in order to make employment conditions more competitive in a new global
environment. Important changes became effective in 2006 that will impact workers
and consequently companies employing them. Can retirement benefits be a
retention and attraction tool for your organization?
The changes
The table below summarizes the main changes to the
CPF.
| Table 1 |
| CPF changes |
1 January 2005 |
1 January 2006 |
|
CPF salary ceiling |
$5,000 |
$4,500 |
|
Additional wage ceiling |
$85,000 - Total ordinary wage subject to CPF
|
$76,500 - Total ordinary wage to CPF
|
|
Limit on CPF contribution
|
$28,050 |
$25,245 |
|
CPF contribution rate for workers aged between 50 and 55
|
Employer: 11%
Employee: 19%
Total: 30% |
Employer: 9%
Employee: 18%
Total: 27% |
The impact
Reducing the amount of contributions paid to the
CPF ultimately reduces the expected retirement benefits to the workers. The
extent will depend on a number of factors including the workers’ salary
progression and age at the date of changes.
The improvement in life expectancy and reduction of
guaranteed investment returns also exacerbate the problem. The current
default option provided by the CPF at retirement is a 20-year annuity.
Pensioners increasingly risk outliving their retirement savings. If they
chose a lifetime annuity, the level of benefits may not be attractive.
Figure 1 shows the estimated retirement benefit reduction
at age 62 for a worker earning above $60,000. The figure also shows the
reduction in employer cost since 2002.

What are companies doing?
Mercer recently conducted a snapshot survey
covering 120 companies from various industry sectors. It appears that 12%
of companies have already passed the savings from CPF contributions back to
employees. A further 9% intends to do so
shortly.
Of those companies who did or intend to pass
back savings to employees, 25% intends to provide additional retirement benefits
to local and/or foreign employees. It is also interesting to note that 59% of
participants view the provision of retirement benefits as a good retention tool
in Singapore.
Mercer can help
Organizations should ask themselves:
-
Are our employees concerned about the
reduction in their CPF retirement benefits?
-
Are all our employees currently covered by
CPF?
-
Do we have a solution in place for non
permanent residents who are not covered by CPF?
-
Can retirement benefits be a retention
and attraction tool for your organization?
Mercer can assist your organization in
assessing the impact of recent changes and propose solutions for your employees
in line with your Corporate objectives.
As a leader in delivering global solutions on
retirement issues, Mercer is continuously monitoring developments affecting
benefit trends, legislation and financial accounting for our clients.
For more
information
For more information on how Mercer Human
Resource Consulting can help you tackle these new challenges,
please contact Marc
Duguay.marc...@mercer.com
|